Since you’re here...

... we have a small favour to ask. More people, like you, are reading and supporting our blog: "Chess Engines Diary". And unlike many other sites and blogs, we made the choice to keep our articles open for all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay.

We hope you will consider supporting us today. We need your support to continue to exist, because good entries are more and more work time. Every reader contribution, however big or small, is so valuable. Support "Chess Engines Diary" even a small amount– and it only takes a minute. Thank you.

My email:

Stockfish 15112108 - new development version very strong chess engine UCI

Stockfish - chess engines UCI

Previous version chess engine Stockfish 

Author compilation - 

Information on the compilation:
Timestamp: 1448090633 

Fix TT comment and static_assert() 

Comment is based on a misunderstanding of what unaligned memory access is. Here is an article that explains it very clearly: 

No matter how we define TTEntry or TTCluster, there will never be any unaligned memory access. This is because the complier knows the alignment rules, and does the necessary adjustments to make sure unaligned memory access does not occur. 

The issue being adressed here has nothing to do with unaligned memory access. It is about cache performance. In order to achieve best cache performance: 
- we prefetch the cacheline as soon as possible. 
- we ensure that TT clusters do not spread across two cachelines. If they did, we would need to prefetch 2 cachelines, which could hurt cache performance. 

Therefore the true conditions to achieve this are: 
1/ start adress of TT is cache line aligned. void TranspositionTable::resize() enforces this. 
2/ TT cluster size should *divide* the cache line size. Currently, we pack 2 clusters per cache lines. It used to be 1 before "TT sardines". Does not matter what the ratio is, all we want is to fit an integer number of clusters per cache line. 

No functional change. 

Resolves #506 



Popular posts from this blog

Chess engine: Leelenstein 925