We decided to check how new chess engines would cope with the 9-year-old, "old" Rhetoric 1.4.3 engine.
Of the eight engines tested, the only one to win against the examiner was the Tomitankchess 5.1 JA engine.
As many as four engines did not win a single game.
If you like this formula, we will continue to organize such tournaments. Please like the post.
Chess Engines Diary Team
@chessenginesdiary Country - Poland, City - Malbork 🕓 Time 3'+3"
💻Asus Zenbook, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, RAM 32,0 GB 🖬 GUI-Arena
R | Engine | CEDR | Score | Rh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rhetoric 1.4.3 | 2631 | 69.0/80 | ||
2 | Tomitankchess 5.1 JA | 2982 | 6.0/10 | 5-3-2 | |
3 | Lozza 3 Dev.874772a JA | 2847 | 3.5/10 | 0-3-7 | |
4 | Eubos 3.7 JA | 2493 | 1.0/10 | 1-9-0 | |
5 | Tcheran 4.0 | 2242 | 0.5/10 | 0-9-1 | |
6 | Kairuku 1.0.1 JA | 2400 | 0.0/10 | 0-10-0 | |
6 | Koedem 1.1.2 JA | 2552 | 0.0/10 | 0-10-0 | |
6 | Belofte 2.1.8 JA | 2221 | 0.0/10 | 0-10-0 | |
6 | Catto 0.12.5 | 2316 | 0.0/10 | 0-10-0 |
Comments
Post a Comment